Tenant Satisfaction Measures Results 2025 – 2026
The Regulator of Social Housing introduced the Tenant Satisfaction Measures in 2023. They outlined 22 tenant satisfaction measures that are used to monitor our performance.
12 of the 22 are measured by carrying out customer surveys that will tell us how satisfied you are with the services we provide across 5 themes which are
- Keeping properties in good repair
- Maintaining building safety
- Respectful and helpful engagement
- Effective handling of complaints
- Responsible neighbourhood management
The remaining 10 TSMs are management information reported by Trident Group covering:
- Homes that do not meet the Decent Homes Standard
- Repairs completed within target timescale
- Gas safety checks
- Fire safety checks
- Asbestos safety checks
- Water safety checks
- Lift safety checks
- Complaints relative to the size of the landlord
- Complaints responded to within Complaint Handling Code timescales
- Anti-social behaviour cases relative to the size of the landlord
This year we have used TLF Research to run anonymous phone surveys with our residents to collect our Tenant Satisfaction Perception Results. You can see the full survey and our performance results below.
We wanted to get the views of all residents to improve the service you receive but have only reported to the Regulator of Social Housing our Low Cost Rental Accommodation following their guidance as Trident has less than 1000 shared ownership properties.
Tenant Satisfaction Perception Results for all residents living in low cost rental accommodation
The graph below shows our scores based on surveys taken by our residents over the year 2025-26.
Customer feedback is extremely important to us and we appreciate everyone who responded to TLF Research as your feedback helps us to improve our services. We know we have areas where we need to improve and we will listen and act on your views.
Key
- The blue bar shows the results for 2025 -2026.
- The purple bar shows the results from 2024 – 2025.
- The grey bar shows the results from 2023 – 2024.
- Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied with the overall service from their landlord. 63.8%
- 59.9%
- 59.4%
- Proportion of respondents who have received a repair in the last 12 months who report that they are satisfied with the overall repairs service. 75.8%
- 66.7%
- 65.3%
- Proportion of respondents who have received a repair in the last 12 months who report that they are satisfied with the time taken to complete their most recent repair. 70.1%
- 64.1%
- 62.4%
- Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their home is well maintained. 66.7%
- 62.5%
- 60.3%
- Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their home is safe. 77.3%
- 70.6%
- 71.7%
- Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their landlord listens to tenant views and acts upon them. 58.2%
- 50.1%
- 49.3%
- Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their landlord keeps them informed about things that matter to them. 68.8%
- 61.1%
- 62.0%
- Proportion of respondents who report that they agree their landlord treats them fairly and with respect. 74.0%
- 69.3%
- 66.4%
- Proportion of respondents who report making a complaint in the last 12 months who are satisfied with their landlord’s approach to complaints handling. 32.3%
- 25.4%
- 25.7%
- Proportion of respondents with communal areas who report that they are satisfied that their landlord keeps communal areas clean and well maintained. 71.6%
- 67.9%
- 63.7%
- Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their landlord makes a positive contribution to the neighbourhood. 66.7%
- 59.8%
- 52.2%
- Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied with their landlord’s approach to handling anti-social behaviour. 63.0%
- 58.9%
- 49.9%
Tenant Satisfaction Measures from Management Information Results
Below you can see our performance against key performance including how well we look after your home and neighbourhood. This is reported from our records and systems.
This includes topics such as building safety, complaints, and anti-social behaviour.
Building Safety
- 99.6% of all gas checks completed
- 100% of all fire risk assessments completed
- 100% of all asbestos surveys or re-inspections completed
- 100% of all legionella risk assessments completed
- 100% of all lift safety checks carried out.
Thank you to all our residents who have helped us to complete these checks and to help keep you safe. Read more about how we keep you safe on our Resident Home Safety page.
Anti-Social Behaviour
We had 41.1 anti-social behaviour cases opened for every 1000 residents with 2.7 per 1000 involving hate crimes. You can learn more about how we support with anti-social behaviour on our specialist page. You can make a report by calling 0300 123 1113 or emailing ASBGroup@tridentgroup.org.uk.
Repairs and Decent Homes Standard
We wish to provide a home that is safe and somewhere you are proud to live. We comply with Decent Homes Standards and aim to complete our repairs within 24 hours for emergencies and 28 working days for a routine repair.
- The vast majority of our homes comply with the Decent Homes Standards – only 0.1% do not.
- 98.4% of emergency repairs are completed within 24 hours
- 98.2% of responsive repairs are completed within 28 working days.
You can report a repair by calling 0300 123 1113 or by using the resident portal.
Complaints
Trident Group is committed to giving you the best service possible, but if something goes wrong, we want you to tell us. We value complaints and use the information from them to help us improve our services. You can read more about how to make a complaint and our process on our complaints page.
Complaints are divided into two stages in line with the Housing Ombudsman Service requirements.
Stage 1
- Last year we received 48.7 complaints per 1000 homes.
- We responded within the Housing Ombudsman’s timescales 95.7% of the time.
Stage 2
- Last year 18.0 complaints per 1000 homes were escalated to stage 2.
- We responded within the Housing Ombudsman’s timescales 92.3% of the time.
Trident Group are committed to continuing to improve the service our customers receive and we will be building on this over the next 12 months. We will be reporting quarterly on key areas that affect customers on our website and social media so that we can be open and accountable. You can view this on our performance page.
These measures are reported to the Regulator of Social Housing annually.
This year TLF Research will continue to undertake the TSM surveys on our behalf. Customers are selected randomly by TLF Research to take part in a short survey throughout the year with the results being collated. You may receive a phone call or email from TLF Research. Your feedback is invaluable, so we would encourage you to take part if you are able to.
You said, we did
- Strengthened our partnership work: Continued works with local partners such as the Birmingham community safety team, charity partners, and services like West Midlands Fire Brigade to continue to add value to the neighbourhood where you live.
- Improved our engagement offer and helping residents feel listened to: We visited every neighbourhood over the financial year helping residents have their say. We also refreshed our Customer Voice Group ensuring more residents from different areas of the organisation could have their voice heard. We also held a scrutiny project to review our repairs and maintenance services.
- More transparent with our policies and procedures: We published our customer facing policies on the website.
- Improved service to residents classified as high risk: For residents who are found to be in high-risk situations or to have high risk vulnerabilities, we improved our decant and access policies and processes. This included a decant officer, regular high-risk meetings, and clearer processes to ensure all residents are treated well and respected.
- Extended our customer service offer: Improved customer experience through the adoption of Dialpad, providing staff with access to call recordings, managers to monitor call quality and a more agile, modern alternative to the legacy Mitel system. Call waiting times reduced from 2 minutes 15 seconds in April 25 to 1 minutes 26 seconds in March 26. We also gave specialist customer service training improving resident experience.
- Kept you better informed using SMS: From the results of the customer census and feedback, we found many residents prefer SMS messaging. A monthly story was shared with customers using texts which was one of the methods improving the tenant satisfaction measure score by 7.8%.
- Strengthened our business continuity exercises: We ensured that all teams react to crises and emergencies effectively and consistently by hosting a tabletop exercise with key colleagues.
- Promoted neighbourhood champions: Continued to promote the neighbourhood champion initiative helping residents to have more influence on the neighbourhoods where they live.
- Learning from complaints: We improved our complaints handling process and are building in learning from our complaints more effectively.
You said, we will do
Following this survey, Trident are committed to following an action plan to improve the service that customers receive. The key actions that this will include are:
Repairs and Maintenance
Continuously work to reduce overdue repairs and missed appointments and keep you updated throughout your repair journey.
Customer service improvements
Respond to enquiries within our service standards and continue to reduce waiting times on customer service calls through staff coaching.
Estate Services
Improve the quality of grounds maintenance and cleaning services. By carrying out regular inspections to ensure standards are met.
Improved Housing Management System
We will implement a new system to improve collaboration and how information is shared between ASB, Complaints and General Enquiries. This will improve user experience and make it easier for us to support you.
Strengthening Our Partnership Working
We will work closer with local partners such as emergency services, charities and local support services. We will improve how effectively share information between our to identify needs and provide better support for our vulnerable residents and strengthen our communities.
Improving Services for High-Risk Residents
We are introducing regular high-risk case review meetings, strengthening our processes and improving oversight to ensure vulnerable and high-risk residents receive the right support at the right time. We will also enhance our decant process and introduce a Senior Housing Officer role to provide operational leadership and oversight.
In addition, we have developed a new Mutual Exchange Policy to improve decision-making, strengthen escalation processes and provide a clearer experience for residents.
Our goal is simple: to provide better homes, better services and better customer experience for everyone who lives with us.
Shared Owner’s Experiences
As Trident have less than 1000 shared owners, we do not have to report these scores to the Regulator for Social Housing. For transparency we have decided to publish these scores for our Shared Owners.
Based on 16 respondents (which is representative of our shared owners), we have the following scores:
Key
- The blue bar shows the results for 2025 -2026.
- The purple bar shows the results from 2024 – 2025.
- TP01 – Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied with the overall service from their landlord. 37.5%
- 52.9%
- TP05 – Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their home is safe. 40%
- 64.3%
- TP06 – Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their landlord listens to tenant views and acts upon them. 21.4%
- 42.9%
- TP07 – Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their landlord keeps them informed about things that matter to them. 42.9%
- 62.5%
- TP08 – Proportion of respondents who report that they agree their landlord treats them fairly and with respect. 42.9%
- 56.3%
- TP09 – Proportion of respondents who report making a complaint in the last 12 months who are satisfied with their landlord’s approach to complaints handling. 11.1%
- 22.2%
- TP10 – Proportion of respondents with communal areas who report that they are satisfied that their landlord keeps communal areas clean and well maintained. 30%
- 41.7%
- TP11 – Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their landlord makes a positive contribution to the neighbourhood. 33.3%
- 66.7%
- TP12 – Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied with their landlord’s approach to handling anti-social behaviour. 55.6%
- 50%
Your Title Goes Here
Your content goes here. Edit or remove this text inline or in the module Content settings. You can also style every aspect of this content in the module Design settings and even apply custom CSS to this text in the module Advanced settings.
Tenant Satisfaction Measures as reported to the Regulator of Social Housing
As required by the Regulator of Social Housing we reported only the Tenant Satisfaction Measures of those residents who live in our general needs and supported rented accommodation (or Low Cost Rental Accommodation) to the Regulator of Social Housing. You can read these full results in the table below.
| Building Safety | ||
| BS01 | Proportion of homes for which all required gas safety checks have been carried out. | 99.6% |
| BS02 | Proportion of homes for which all required fire risk assessments have been carried out. | 100% |
| BS03 | Proportion of homes for which all required asbestos management surveys or re-inspections have been carried out. | 100% |
| BS04 | Proportion of homes for which all required legionella risk assessments have been carried out. | 100% |
| BS05 | Proportion of homes for which all required communal passenger lift safety checks have been carried out. | 100% |
| Complaints Handling | ||
| CHO1 | Number of stage one complaints made by tenants in the relevant stock type during the reporting year per 1,000 homes. | 48.7 |
| CH02 | Proportion of stage one complaints responded to within the Housing Ombudsman’s Complaint Handling Code timescales. | 95.7% |
| CH01 | Number of stage two complaints made by tenants in the relevant stock type during the reporting year per 1,000 homes. | 18.0 |
| CH02 | Proportion of stage two complaints responded to within the Housing Ombudsman’s Complaint Handling Code timescales. | 92.3% |
| Anti-Social Behaviour | ||
| NM01 (Part 1) | Number of anti-social behaviour cases opened per 1,000 homes. | 41.1 |
| NM01 (Part 2) | Number of anti-social behaviour cases that involve hate incidents opened per 1,000 homes. | 2.7 |
| Decent Homes Standards and Repairs | ||
| RP01 | Proportion of homes that do not meet the Decent Homes Standard. | 0.1% |
| RP02 (pt1) | Proportion of non-emergency responsive repairs completed within the landlord’s target timescale of 28 working days. | 98.2% |
| RP02 (pt2) | Proportion of emergency responsive repairs completed within the landlord’s target timescale of 24 hours. | 98.4% |
| Tenant Perception Measures | ||
| TP01 | Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied with the overall service from their landlord. | 63.8% |
| TP02 | Proportion of respondents who have received a repair in the last 12 months who report that they are satisfied with the overall repairs service. | 75.8% |
| TP03 | Proportion of respondents who have received a repair in the last 12 months who report that they are satisfied with the time taken to complete their most recent repair. | 70.1% |
| TP04 | Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their home is well maintained. | 66.7% |
| TP05 | Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their home is safe. | 77.3% |
| TP06 | Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their landlord listens to tenant views and acts upon them. | 58.2% |
| TP07 | Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their landlord keeps them informed about things that matter to them. | 68.8% |
| TP08 | Proportion of respondents who report that they agree their landlord treats them fairly and with respect. | 74% |
| TP09 | Proportion of respondents who report making a complaint in the last 12 months who are satisfied with their landlord’s approach to complaints handling. | 32.3% |
| TP10 | Proportion of respondents with communal areas who report that they are satisfied that their landlord keeps communal areas clean and well maintained. | 71.6% |
| TP11 | Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their landlord makes a positive contribution to the neighbourhood. | 66.7% |
| TP12 | Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied with their landlord’s approach to handling anti-social behaviour. | 63.0% |
Trident acknowledges the necessity to meet all requirements within the TSM Tenant Survey Guidance and the TSM Technical Guidance and confirm we have done so.
TLF Research carried out the survey for the Tenant Perceptions in line with the guidance provided by Regulator of Social Housing. The decision to move from a census to a quarterly sample was made after reviewing the approach of our peers in TSM year one. This helped Trident align better to reflect what other RPs had used for benchmarking purposes and enabling opportunities to take the learnings of others onboard from the providers who were achieving high levels of satisfaction.
The survey design meets the specified requirements within Annex 4 of the Tenant Satisfaction Measures: Technical Requirements.
Sampling and weighting
We did not apply any sampling or weighting to the survey, as the respondents were proportionate to the relevant tenant population allowing for no sampling or weighting to be required.
All our residents were invited to take part, with 508 people living in a Low Cost Rental Accommodation responding.
Summary of representativeness
To ensure our Tenant Satisfaction Measures (TSM) results were robust and representative, Trident Housing Group worked with our research partner, TLF, to complete telephone surveys with 127 tenants per quarter throughout 2025/26.
In addition to age, we also monitored survey responses by tenure type and ethnicity to ensure the overall sample reflected the diversity of our resident base. A stratified random sampling method was used to achieve this balance.
In line with TSM requirements, once a tenant had completed a survey, they were excluded from further surveying within the year to ensure only one response per household. Tenants who declined to take part were removed from the sampling pool for six months, in line with Market Research Society (MRS) best practice.
To ensure that the sample achieved was representative of the total tenant base, we created a sample frame from the total population. For any missing information, these were categorised as ‘unknown’ and still included within the sample frame.
Sample representativeness was monitored monthly through the data collected within our in-house telephone unit.
The tables below show how the TSM survey returns relate to our actual stock and resident profiles:
| Age | Returns | Database |
| 25 and under (32) | 6.3% | 6.3% |
| 26-35 (74) | 14.6% | 14.7% |
| 36 – 45 (92) | 18.1% | 17.9% |
| 45-55 (98) | 19.3% | 19.3% |
| 56-65 (109) | 21.5% | 21.4% |
| 66-75 (55) | 10.8% | 10.6% |
| Over 75 (45) | 8.9% | 8.8% |
| Unknown (3) | 0.6% | 1.0% |
| Tenure | Returns | Database |
| General Needs (332) | 65.3% | 63.3% |
| Supported Housing (70) | 13.8% | 14.8% |
| Sheltered (75) | 14.8% | 15.7% |
| Intermediate Rent (31) | 6.1% | 6.4% |
| Ethnicity | Returns | Database |
| White (269) | 53% | 51.5% |
| Black, Black British, Caribbean or African (110) | 21.7% | 20.7% |
| Asian or Asian British (38) | 7.5% | 10.9% |
| Unknown (35) | 7.5% | 8.2% |
| Mixed or multiple ethnic groups (31) | 6.1% | 6.0% |
| Other ethnic group (22) | 4.3% | 2.7% |
| Region | Returns | Database |
| Birmingham (333) | 65.6% | 65.7% |
| Sandwell (80) | 15.7% | 14.1% |
| South Derbyshire (46) | 9.1% | 10.3% |
| Bolsover (11) | 2.2% | 1.4% |
| Telford and Wrekin (10) | 2.0% | 2.2% |
| Solihull (6) | 1.2% | 0.9% |
| Lichfield (5) | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| North West Leicestershire (4) | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Shropshire (4) | 0.8% | 1.4% |
| Redditch (3) | 0.6% | 0.5% |
| Staffordshire (3) | 0.6% | 0.4% |
| Wychavon (2) | 0.4% | 0.7% |
| Unknown (1) | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Gender | Returns | Database |
| Male (248) | 48.8% | 45.3% |
| Female (232) | 45.7% | 50.0% |
| Transgender (1) | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| Unknown (27) | 5.3% | 4.7% |
Exclusions
All relevant stock types and tenant groups were included and with no exclusions.
External Contractor
These surveys were co-ordinated by TLF Research and they collected and validated the results on our behalf, allowing respondents the opportunity to speak openly. We went with TLF Research following a rigorous procurement process as we wished to move to a quarterly sample like other providers to better help with benchmarking and were confident in TLF Research’s experience in social housing customer surveys.
Timing of the survey
TLF Research, on our behalf, contacted residents between 4th June 2025 and 2nd March 2026.
To ensure our Tenant Satisfaction Measures (TSM) results were robust and representative, we completed telephone surveys with 127 tenants per quarter throughout 2025/26.
Collection Methods
Surveys were distributed across our full tenant base using telephone and postal methods to ensure inclusive and representative feedback.
Of the 508 respondents; 506 completed by telephone and 2 by post. Telephone surveys tend to yield a more balanced range of responses, typically following a normal distribution curve. Telephone surveys are particularly effective at reaching seldom-heard residents, as individuals are contacted directly rather than being expected to respond to an invitation sent via email, SMS, or post. Additionally, the direct and interactive nature of telephone interviews tends to result in fewer partially completed surveys, allowing for more comprehensive data collection.
Questionnaire
We used multiple questionnaires across the year as we responded to the results and wanted to get more information from residents. All surveys met the criteria as defined in the Regulator for Social Housing’s Tenant Survey Requirements.
Incentives
Trident Group and TLF Research did not use incentives to encourage completion.

